Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356869›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Anomaly Detection in Wind Turbines: Persistence-Based Alarm Confirmation for False-Alarm Mitigation and Detection-Latency Trade-Offs.

Welker Facchini Nogueira, Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski, Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani, Luiz David Ricarte de Souza Custodio, Demetrio Cornilios Zachariadis, Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Welker Facchini NogueiraDepartment of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitária, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-3210-9434
Miguel Angelo de Carvalho MichalskiDepartment of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitária, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-1651
Arthur Henrique de Andrade MelaniDepartment of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitária, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6955-7542
Luiz David Ricarte de Souza CustodioDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-4637-2346
Demetrio Cornilios ZachariadisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitaria, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5168-7269
Gilberto Francisco Martha de SouzaDepartment of Mechatronics and Mechanical Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, Cidade Universitária, Sao Paulo 05508-030, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-7038

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Universidade de São PauloFundação para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico da EngenhariaNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development 303986/2022-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomaly detection models trained exclusively on healthy data are widely used in wind turbine condition monitoring because failure data are scarce, heterogeneous, and often unavailable. However, these models produce anomaly indicators that are sensitive not only to fault-related degradation but also to normal operational variability, transient disturbances, and changes in loading conditions. As a result, the practical behavior of an alarm system depends not only on the anomaly detection model but also on the decision rule used to activate and maintain alarm states. This study presents a decision-oriented evaluation of persistence-based alarm confirmation in wind turbine anomaly detection. Four representative techniques are analyzed within a unified framework: Isolation Forest, One-Class Support Vector Machine, Referenced Moving Window Principal Component Analysis using Q-statistic and percentage component weight indicators, and Autoencoder-based reconstruction error. The evaluation combines controlled OpenFAST simulations of rotor unbalance under different severity and noise conditions with an industrial SCADA case study involving a documented main bearing fault. Results show that temporal persistence strongly shapes alarm outcomes across methods and datasets. Low persistence values favor early detection but promote alarms from isolated threshold exceedances, whereas moderate persistence substantially reduces false positives while preserving detection capability in severe and well-observable faults. Excessive persistence increases detection latency and missed detections, particularly for weak, intermittent, or slowly evolving fault signatures. These findings indicate that persistence-based alarm confirmation should be treated as an explicit decision-level configuration variable, rather than as a fixed post-processing or alarm-state heuristic, when designing anomaly detection systems for wind turbine condition monitoring.

Indexed as

anomaly detection detectioncondition monitoringdecision policiesfalse alarm risk and trust controlwind turbines

Identifiers

PMID42356869
PMCPMC13306807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.