Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356860›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Comprehensive Survey on Online AutoML and Adversarial Robustness for IoT and EV Charging Network Security.

Wajiha Zaheer, Chukwunonso Henry Nwokoye, Seyedeh Negar Afrasiabi, Khalil El-Khatib, Li Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wajiha ZaheerFaculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Chukwunonso Henry NwokoyeFaculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-3734
Seyedeh Negar AfrasiabiFaculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-5768
Khalil El-KhatibFaculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.
Li YangFaculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9383-1097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing deployment of IoT-enabled electric-vehicle charging networks has created a rapidly evolving cyber-physical environment in which security mechanisms must operate amid ever-changing data patterns and resource constraints. In these environments, static Machine Learning (ML) pipelines are often insufficient because they struggle to adapt to concept drift issues, emerging attacks, and real-time operational requirements. We analyzed cybersecurity vulnerabilities, challenges of conventional ML approaches, and the possibilities of AI-powered, adaptive security measures. This paper examines Online AutoML and its advantages, including automated adaptation to streaming data, reduced human intervention, and privacy-preserving, resource-aware learning. Furthermore, this paper discusses adversarial attacks and defences in Online AutoML systems, highlighting the need for frameworks that jointly address concept drift, scalability, privacy, and adversarial threats. Finally, this study emphasizes the importance of establishing comprehensive public benchmarks for Online AutoML research.

Indexed as

adversarial machine learningautomated machine learning (AutoML)Electric Vehicles Charging Networks (EVCN)Internet of Things (IoT)online stream learning

Identifiers

PMID42356860
PMCPMC13306787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.