ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
SRM: A Source-Reprojection Module for Cross-Day sEMG Gesture Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) gesture recognition degrades across recording days under domain shift, increasing calibration burden for myoelectric interfaces. Many cross-day adaptation pipelines retrain the deployed recognizer or require labeled target-session data, which can be impractical in assistive-device settings where classifier versions may need to remain locked for traceability and regulatory compliance. We study unsupervised cross-day adaptation under two constraints: the task classifier remains frozen and holdout-day labels are not used when training the adaptor. We propose the Source-Reprojection Module (SRM), a plug-in front end that combines conditional adversarial feature learning with a residual signal-space projector guided by the frozen classifier's gradients, identity regularization, and latent-space distribution matching, using labeled source days and unlabeled adaptation days only. On a multi-day protocol with four healthy participants (at least five calendar-day sessions per participant, split 3:1:1 into source, adaptation, and holdout domains) and three random seeds per participant (12 runs), mean holdout accuracy increases from 70.9% for the frozen classifier alone to 72.8% with SRM (+1.98±0.91 percentage points averaged across subjects). SRM outperforms the frozen baseline in 10 of 12 subject-seed runs. The gain is modest and the cohort is small, so the result supports proof-of-mechanism under the stated protocol rather than population-level clinical generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.