ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal and Autoregressive Features for Cattle Behavior Classification Using Low-Power LoRaWAN Accelerometer Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Task Training Semantic Communication System for Image Reconstruction and Classification Tasks.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accelerometer sensors and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping automated behavior monitoring in precision livestock management, yet their joint deployment on extensive rangelands is constrained by energy and bandwidth budgets. Low-Power Long-Range Wide-Area Network (LoRaWAN) collars address these constraints by compressing the raw tri-axial signal on the device into a single scalar per reporting interval, the Motion Index (MI). This onboard compression preserves enough signal to separate active behaviors but discards the per-axis and frequency content that fine-grained classification typically relies on. On a dataset of 9222 labeled observations from 24 cows across four breeds, MI distinguishes walking from grazing reliably but fails to separate ruminating from resting; both correspond to a stationary animal and yield near-zero, statistically indistinguishable distributions. Earlier MI-only models reached only about 65% four-class accuracy, and ruminating was commonly merged into resting. We show that much of this loss can be recovered by treating the MI stream as a time series. Session-aware lag features, rolling statistics, and an autoregressive previous-behavior feature lift four-class macro-F1 from 0.647 to 0.94, with per-class F1 of 0.95 for ruminating and 0.92 for resting (and at least 0.92 for every behavior). In autonomous deployment the previous behavior must be predicted rather than observed; for this setting we add a Viterbi sequence-decoding step that combines the classifier's per-step outputs with a learned behavior-transition model, recovering a substantial part of the ruminating signal from the activity stream alone while keeping walking and grazing reliable. The gain is consistent across seven classifiers and four genetically distinct breeds, indicating that it is driven by the features rather than by a specific model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.