ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
YOLO-FSEP: An Improved YOLOv8n Algorithm for Sugar Orange Detection in Orchards.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D Object Detection Based on Polar Representation for Better Comprehensive Performances.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges of detecting sugar orange fruits in complex natural orchard environments-where fruits are frequently occluded by leaves and branches and may be mutually occluded due to dense growth, leading to missed detections, false positives, and low detection confidence-we propose an improved algorithm based on YOLOv8n, named YOLO-FSEP. A Spatial-Channel Synergistic Attention (SCSA) module is introduced into the main network to enhance feature extraction capabilities; the IoU loss function is replaced with Focal_SIOU to improve the detection accuracy for difficult samples; and an SE attention mechanism is embedded in the detection head, with the addition of a P6 high-resolution detection layer to optimize multi-scale object performance. Experimental results on a self-built sugar orange dataset show that, compared to the baseline YOLOv8n, the improved model achieves a 0.9% increase in accuracy, a 1.3% increase in recall, and a 3.2% increase in mAP50-95, while maintaining an inference speed of 62.6 FPS. To evaluate the model under dynamic conditions, we performed a 200-frame continuous test of the 3D localization pipeline on a laptop with a RealSense D435i camera. The average YOLO inference time was 49.90 ms, post-processing (depth extraction and 3D coordinate conversion) took 0.24 ms, and the total processing time was 50.15 ms. Given that the typical response time for a robotic arm's single positioning operation is 100-200 ms, this real-time performance meets the dynamic localization requirements of sugar orange harvesting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.