ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
IoT-Driven Robust Bearing Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors Under Operating-Condition Shift.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable bearing fault diagnosis in induction motors is essential for predictive maintenance and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications. However, diagnostic models that perform well under random or measurement-wise data splits may fail when deployed under unseen operating conditions. This study presents a robustness-oriented comparative evaluation of induction motor bearing fault diagnosis models using vibration and phase-current signals from a controlled medium subset of the Paderborn bearing dataset. Raw temporal 1D-CNN models, STFT-based 2D-CNN representations, and vibration-current fusion strategies were evaluated under measurement-wise and operating-condition holdout protocols. Under measurement-wise validation, the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved a Macro-F1 score of 0.9251. Under the stricter operating-condition holdout setting, the same model achieved the highest robustness among the evaluated CNN models. Multi-seed validation confirmed its stability, with a mean Macro-F1 of 0.8626, a worst-case Macro-F1 of 0.7159, and a robustness score of 0.7850. The selected model remained lightweight, requiring 73,891 trainable parameters and an estimated model size of 0.282 MB. Additional revision experiments were conducted to address bearing-identity sharing and classical baseline comparisons. In the bearing-code-disjoint validation test, both raw temporal models showed reduced performance, and early fusion did not significantly outperform vibration-only learning. The 1D-CNN Vibration model achieved a mean Macro-F1 of 0.5616, while the 1D-CNN Early Fusion model achieved 0.5485; the paired Wilcoxon test was not significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.