ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Movement-Based Low Back Pain Subgroups Using Motion Tape Strain Data with Biomechanical and Causal Feature Engineering.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a major global health problem and can result in a variety of movement impairments. Advances in smart technology have enabled the collection of novel streams of movement data, and machine learning (ML) methods have been increasingly used for data analysis. However, many existing technologies remain expensive and unsuitable for widespread clinical use, and ML approaches have largely focused on distinguishing people with LBP from healthy controls rather than identifying meaningful subgroups within the LBP population. Motion Tape (MT) is a recently developed wearable strain sensor that translates skin deformation from underlying movement and muscle engagement into electrical signals. In this exploratory study involving 10 participants with LBP, we demonstrate that MT data from six sensors applied on the lower back capture rich movement information capable of characterizing movement patterns among participants with LBP. We propose a feature engineering approach based on biomechanical features as well as time-series causal discovery applied to multivariate sensor time-series data to extract directed inter-segment coordination patterns. We further develop an exploratory subgroup discovery pipeline by aggregating clustering coassociation information across diverse movement tasks. Our causal coordination features show promising discriminative information across several movement types, capturing aspects of motor control not reflected in amplitude-based or embedding-based features alone, such as asymmetries and movement restrictions. Preliminary ensemble clustering analysis indicates three potential LBP subgroups distinguished by biomechanical and inter-segment coordination patterns, which may reflect varied strategies under different movement demands. We investigate the differences in clinical characteristics among these LBP subgroups. We show that time-series foundation models are not well suited for LBP subgrouping due to their uninterpretability, which is improved in our feature engineering pipeline. This framework could reveal additional subgroups with larger cohorts and may generalize to other sensor modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.