ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Study on Preprocessing Methods for Ultrasonic Signals from Internal Defects in Rolls.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of internal defects in rolls is crucial for industrial safety and product quality. Ultrasonic testing is a mainstream non-destructive method widely used for this purpose. However, in practice, ultrasonic echo signals often suffer from background clutter. When defects are located near the surface, weak defect echoes tend to couple with surface echoes, making signal extraction difficult and reducing the accuracy of subsequent feature extraction and classification. This paper proposes a novel ultrasonic signal preprocessing method aimed at improving the performance of subsequent defect identification models. The method first acquires ultrasonic signals from defect regions and background clutter reference signals from defect-free regions using a digital ultrasonic flaw detector. An improved median filter is then applied to remove spike interference and boundary outliers. On this basis, a multi-stage FIR (finite impulse response) filter is constructed, and particle swarm optimization is employed to adaptively optimize filter parameters, achieving an accurate estimation of background clutter. Finally, the clutter-suppressed defect signal is obtained through signal subtraction. Experimental results on a dataset of 5000 samples (2500 defective, 2500 non-defective) containing cylindrical artificial defects (diameter 8 mm, length 30 mm) demonstrate that using a CNN classifier with the same feature extraction and classification model, the signals preprocessed by the proposed method outperform traditional median filtering and wavelet denoising methods. The defect identification accuracy is improved by approximately 38 percentage points compared to median filtering and 20 percentage points compared to wavelet denoising, while also achieving a high recall rate, validating the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing roll internal defect detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.