ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Lightweight Geometric Framework for High-Precision 3D Gaze Tracking Based on Infrared Image Processing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Head-mounted eye-tracking systems play a critical role in virtual reality, human-computer interaction, and clinical applications, yet achieving both high angular accuracy and precise 3D gaze position estimation with low-cost hardware remains challenging. This paper proposes a lightweight, training-free geometric 3D gaze tracking framework for binocular 3D gaze tracking using consumer-grade hardware, which leverages stereo geometric triangulation and a simplified physiological eye model to achieve robust 3D gaze estimation, requiring only standard infrared cameras and dichroic mirrors without additional specialized hardware. The method was evaluated in controlled indoor conditions with 30 participants, where it achieved an angular error ranging from 1.1° to 2.82° and a 3D gaze position error below 13.24 mm. Compared to two state-of-the-art academic non-deep-learning methods, the proposed framework delivers competitive angular accuracy while significantly reducing 3D position error, outperforming the baselines by 34% to 56% in depth estimation precision. These results demonstrates that the proposed geometric framework is a practical and effective solution for high-precision 3D gaze tracking on low-cost hardware, suitable for both research and consumer applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.