ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
RGB-D Mirror Segmentation with Reliability-Guided Residual Correction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mirror segmentation remains challenging because mirror regions often share appearance with the reflected scene, while sensor depth around mirrors is frequently missing, noisy, or geometrically inconsistent. Although recent RGB-based methods have achieved strong results by exploiting contextual and symmetry-aware cues, their ability to use geometric information reliably is still limited. In this paper, we propose a reliable RGB-D mirror segmentation framework built upon SATNet. Specifically, we extend the symmetry-aware baseline with a dedicated depth branch that injects hierarchical sensor-depth features into the multi-scale decoder, and we introduce a Reliability-Guided Residual Correction Module (RGRCM) for final prediction refinement. Instead of treating predicted depth as an independent modality branch, RGRCM internally constructs dual-depth evidence from sensor depth and monocular depth estimated by a pretrained Depth Anything v2 model, encoding raw depth observations, cross-depth discrepancies, validity cues, and local depth instability. The resulting evidence is used to guide uncertainty-aware residual correction only in regions where depth-driven refinement is likely to be beneficial. Experiments on the RGBD-Mirror benchmark show that the proposed method achieves 83.57 IoU, 0.899 Fβ, 0.026 MAE, and 6.26 BER, outperforming existing RGB and RGB-D mirror segmentation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.