ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Cascaded Quantized Spiking Neural Network for Real-Time ECG Arrhythmia Detection on Edge Hardware.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cascaded Quantized Spiking Neural Network for Real-Time ECG Arrhythmia Detection on Edge Hardware.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable ECG monitors enable continuous cardiac surveillance, but most still rely on cloud-based analysis with limited on-device support for multi-class arrhythmia detection. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are promising for low-power edge inference, yet it remains unclear how class-imbalance loss design interacts with RR-interval features in directly trained quantized SNNs, and FPGA validation in this setting is largely unexplored. We propose a quantized convolutional spiking neural network (QCSNN) for real-time arrhythmia detection on resource-constrained hardware. The model uses a dual-head architecture that jointly trains binary and four-class classifiers, subsequently reorganized into a cascaded pipeline that routes only abnormal beats to the second stage. At inference, beats classified as Normal exit at Stage 1; only beats classified as Abnormal are routed to the four-class head, so the bulk of the inference cost is absorbed by Stage 1. We evaluate two loss functions, Cross-Entropy and Focal Loss, under four RR-feature routing strategies. Without RR features, Focal Loss improves macro F1 by 2.3-2.5% over Cross-Entropy (mean Δ = +0.013 in Stage-2 macro F1; Wilcoxon two-sided
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.