ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development of an Air Temperature Observation System Using a Radiation Shield and Neural Network Correction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate air temperature observation requires minimizing solar radiation-induced deviations, which are strongly influenced by radiation shield performance. However, conventional shields often produce significant errors under strong solar radiation or weak ventilation. In this study, an air temperature observation system integrating a radiation shield and a backpropagation (BP) neural network-based correction method is proposed. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were conducted to quantify radiation-induced temperature deviations under representative meteorological conditions, and the simulated dataset was used to train and test the neural network model. Initial field comparison experiments were performed using a 076B forced-ventilation system as a reference, where measured differences were treated as experimental deviations and model outputs as predicted deviations. The results show that, before correction, the proposed system exhibited a maximum deviation of 1.05 °C and a mean deviation of 0.26 °C, while the root mean square error and mean absolute error between experimental and predicted deviations were 0.30 °C and 0.23 °C, respectively. The correction significantly reduced temperature deviations, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed system in improving measurement accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.