ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Validation of Pupil Response During Walking in Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupil response may be a useful biomarker in Parkinson's disease (PD) due to links with autonomic function and cognitive load. However, research has focused on static tasks, missing functional demands during real-world activities like walking.
methodsWe recruited 38 people with PD and 16 healthy controls who walked for 2 min under single- and dual-task conditions while wearing mobile eye-tracking glasses (Tobii Pro Glasses 2, 100 Hz). Pupil response outcomes (velocity, size, difference between eyes) were extracted alongside gait characteristics from inertial sensors. Known groups validity compared PD and controls; convergent/divergent validity examined relationships with cognitive, visual, clinical, and gait measures.
resultsPeople with PD had significantly altered pupil constriction/dilation velocity (
conclusionsPupil response during walking demonstrates known groups and convergent validity, indicating potential as a clinical biomarker for PD. Following this initial study, more research is required to further validate pupil response in PD (e.g., analytical validation and testing within real-world ecologically valid environments).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.