ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Personalized Adaptive Gabor Filtering with Three-Stage Semi-Supervised Domain-Adversarial Learning for Cross-Subject SSVEP Decoding.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving the decoding accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) of steady-state visual evoked potential brain-computer interface (SSVEP-BCI) systems, while enhancing cross-subject generalization and reducing calibration cost, is essential for practical deployment. This study proposes an end-to-end framework that integrates adaptive filtering with semi-supervised domain adaptation. The framework incorporates a Gabor adaptive filter bank (G-AFB) to optimize time-frequency representations and extract features matched to individual neural responses. It also introduces a three-stage semi-supervised domain-adversarial neural network (TriS-DANN), which combines unsupervised pre-alignment and supervised fine-tuning to align cross-subject feature distributions and enable lightweight calibration. On the 1.0 s public benchmark dataset, G-AFB-tCNN achieved 89.13% accuracy, a 4.63 percentage-point improvement over its conventional filter-bank counterpart. On the 0.4 s in-house dataset, G-AFB-tCNN achieved 91.85% accuracy, a 3.22 percentage-point improvement over the conventional fixed filter bank. In transfer learning, TriS-DANN reached 86.60% accuracy using 0.4 s segments extracted from the stimulation period and only 23.07% of the available target-domain training/calibration trials, demonstrating higher efficiency and stability than conventional fine-tuning. These results support the proposed framework as a feasible route toward reliable, low-calibration SSVEP-BCI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.