ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Interpretable Framework for Sleep Monitoring: Applying Statistical Control Charts to Physiological Data Streams.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polysomnography monitors sleep health with non-linear physiological time-series data, consequently making interpretability a challenge. This study explores the feasibility of applying control charts, a statistical process control method, to cardio-respiratory signals derived from polysomnography studies to provide transparent and interpretable analysis of sleep-related physiological variability. Cardio-respiratory signals from a publicly available polysomnography dataset were preprocessed, transformed, and analyzed using univariate control charts. Sleep stage annotations were used as reference information to contextualize physiological variability across wake and non-REM sleep stages. Phase-level control chart rule violations were examined relative to annotated sleep-state transitions and summarized quantitatively. The results indicate that control chart rule violations occur more frequently during wakefulness and at wake-non-REM sleep transitions, while remaining relatively stable during sustained non-REM sleep. These findings indicate structural correspondence between SPC-based variability flags and annotated sleep stage dynamics. This exploratory, feasibility-focused study does not evaluate diagnostic performance or detection accuracy. Instead, it provides evidence that SPC control charts can serve as a transparent and interpretable analytical framework for exploring physiological variability in sleep data and for supporting future research on sleep-state analysis and explainable data-driven methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.