ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Metrological Characterization of Low-Cost CO
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-cost sensors are increasingly used in atmospheric monitoring to provide spatially distributed measurements of gas concentrations, often through sensor networks. However, their application is still limited by the lack of metrologically robust characterization procedures. This work addresses a metrological characterization of SCD30 (Sensirion) non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) low-cost sensors for atmospheric carbon dioxide measurements, tested against an NDIR reference analyzer. A dedicated experimental facility and a systematic characterization procedure were developed using a dynamic dilution method in an isolator, covering a concentration range of approximately (350-950) µmol/mol, representative of typical ambient conditions. The analysis focused on sensor performance, calibration functions, uncertainty evaluation, and statistical indicators. Results show that all sensors exhibit good linearity but significant systematic deviations. The uncertainty evaluation highlights reproducibility as the dominant contribution (>85% of the uncertainty budget). The results demonstrate that, after applying calibration, root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) are reduced below 20 µmol/mol, demonstrating a substantial improvement in accuracy. The Bland-Altman analysis shows a good agreement between the reference instrument and the low-cost sensors. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework for the metrological evaluation and calibration of low-cost sensors, which can be extended to other atmospheric gases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.