ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Two-Stage Interpretable Fault Diagnosis Approach for Bearings Based on EBM.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, explainable artificial intelligence has received increasing attention in the field of bearing fault diagnosis. However, existing interpretability methods, such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), often rely on the quality of input features. To achieve high diagnostic accuracy, researchers often extract a large number of features from vibration signals across multiple domains, leading to feature redundancy. This redundancy not only increases the computational cost and risk of overfitting in diagnostic models but also dilutes the contributions of core features during interpretability analysis, resulting in biased explanations. To address this challenge, we propose a two-stage interpretable fault diagnosis approach. In the first stage, the Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) selects core features to reduce redundancy. In the second stage, EBM is enhanced by Random Forest (RF) through residual learning to form the RF-EBM diagnostic model. EBM and SHAP are further used for dual interpretability analysis. Experimental results on public laboratory benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves good diagnostic performance and outperforms traditional EBM. Overall, the approach reduces redundancy through feature selection, improves diagnostic performance, and makes the decision-making process more transparent, providing a useful methodological reference for trustworthy fault diagnosis in industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.