ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Research on Auxiliary Decision-Making System for Manned Underwater Vehicle Damage Management Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In underwater navigation, MUVs risk damage from obstacles and equipment. Effective damage management supports timely decisions and maximizes functionality recovery. Existing approaches can be roughly categorized into rule-based reasoning, case-based reasoning and expert systems. However, the primary limitation of the existing approaches is their inability to adapt to dynamically changing scenarios. In this paper, an auxiliary decision-making system (ADMS) for manned underwater vehicle (MUV) damage management based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is proposed to address the problem of cabin flooding. This system is designed to provide auxiliary decision-making in emergency situations and help preserve MUV vitality. Furthermore, a comprehensive States-Actions cluster encompassing various damage management measures for real damage scenarios is constructed and digitized. Moreover, several novel reward functions are developed to ensure the DRL model obtains a safe strategy with ADMS operations. Finally, the MUV buoyancy and stability vitality evaluation criteria are defined and analyzed. The simulation results show that the auxiliary decision-making measures given by the ADMS in the damage state are effective and rational. The evaluation criterion for buoyancy vitality can exceed 38%, while the criterion for stability vitality can surpass 92%, with an optimal value exceeding 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.