ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dual-Signal Direct Time-of-Flight Method for Long-Range Groundwater Level Monitoring in Observation Wells.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and reliable groundwater-level monitoring in deep observation wells remains difficult for conventional non-contact ultrasonic systems because narrow tubular geometries intensify multipath reflections, signal attenuation, and echo ambiguity. This study proposes a dual-signal direct time-of-flight (ToF) method that combines radiofrequency (RF) synchronization with one-way airborne ultrasonic propagation to a floating receiver located at the groundwater surface. In the proposed architecture, the RF signal provides a near-instantaneous time reference, whereas the ultrasonic signal defines the propagation delay, thereby eliminating dependence on echo-based ranging. The system integrates a wellhead surface unit for synchronized transmission and control, a floating unit for ToF acquisition and embedded processing, and an optional reference channel for in situ estimation of the effective sound speed. A duty-cycled power architecture is used to support low-power long-term deployment, while a multi-shot acquisition strategy with a median-like estimator improves robustness against startup transients, timing jitters, and false detections. Field validation was conducted over a 12-month period under actual groundwater-monitoring conditions, during which the groundwater depth varied between 14 m and 30 m below the wellhead datum. Within this field-validation interval, the proposed system achieved a mean absolute error of 0.048 m, a maximum absolute error of 0.050 m, and an overall valid detection rate of 99.4% over 358 valid cycles out of 360 scheduled cycles. In addition, a separate range-dependent confined-tubular propagation test was conducted to evaluate the extended detection capability of the RF-synchronized one-way ultrasonic ToF architecture. This test demonstrated stable acoustic-link ToF detection up to 300 m inside the tested 170 mm confined plastic pipeline. Therefore, the 300 m result should be interpreted as a range-dependent valid-detection result rather than as a 12-month groundwater-depth validation over the full 300 m interval. These results demonstrate that the proposed direct-ToF method provides an RF-synchronized one-way ultrasonic ToF framework with a floating receiver for groundwater-level monitoring in deep observation wells, while remaining compatible with low-power and IoT-based environmental monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.