ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Human-Centered Multimodal Framework for Characterizing Safety-Relevant Driver Functional Domains: An Exploratory Study of Professional Bus Drivers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a human-centered multimodal framework for characterizing safety-relevant driver functional domains in professional bus drivers. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on isolated psychological or physical assessments, the proposed framework integrates self-perception, psychomotor performance, and cognitive-perceptual assessment to provide an exploratory, structured characterization of driver-related functional capacities. Eighteen professional bus drivers participated in this study. Self-perception data were obtained from all 18 participants, whereas psychomotor and cognitive-perceptual assessments were completed by 16 participants. These measurements were used to examine multiple domains relevant to driving safety, including behavioral awareness, motor coordination, attention, visual tracking, and hazard-perception-related processing. Given the modest sample size, the study should be regarded as an exploratory pilot investigation. Data were analyzed using a laboratory-based cross-sectional between-subjects design to examine age- and gender-related differences across the assessed domains. The findings suggested that selected age- and gender-related differences and descriptive tendencies were observable across multiple domains. Male drivers descriptively showed higher self-rating scores, female drivers showed different performance tendencies in selected psychomotor tasks, and male drivers demonstrated substantially greater grip strength. Older drivers showed slower and less efficient performance in several cognitive-perceptual measures, with the clearest age-related effect observed in the tachistoscopic traffic test, where older participants showed a higher error tendency under time-constrained traffic-scene processing conditions. The constructs and measures proposed in this study are intended as general laboratory-based assessments of driver-related capabilities rather than direct measures of actual driving performance, real-time driver-state indicators, or validated sensor-based monitoring indicators. As candidate human-factor constructs, they may inform future driver monitoring research by helping clarify how driver-related signals or behaviors could eventually be linked to underlying functional and safety-related meaning in intelligent transportation environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.