Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Photovoltaic Cell Defect Classification: A Systematic Comparison of LoRA, QLoRA, and Full Fine-Tuning on ConvNeXt-Tiny.

Automated visual inspection of photovoltaic (PV) cells is an important component of solar-module quality assurance. However, adapting modern pre-trained vision backbones to PV defect classification remains challenging because full fine-tuning requires substantial memory, naturally imbalanced datasets can reduce sensitivity to rare defect classes, and edge-oriented inspection workflows impose computational constraints. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Quantized LoRA (QLoRA), have been widely studied in natural language processing, but their use for PV defect classification remains underexplored. This study presents a controlled benchmark of LoRA and QLoRA against full fine-tuning for PV cell defect classification. Four adaptation strategies-full fine-tuning, LoRA with rank 8, LoRA with rank 16, and 4-bit QLoRA with rank 16-are evaluated using a ConvNeXt-Tiny backbone on a 17,377-image polycrystalline PV cell electroluminescence dataset referred to as POLY, covering five classes: intact, cracked, broken, surface-diffuse, and surface-point. The natural 6.7× class imbalance is preserved without synthetic resampling, and a group-aware StratifiedGroupKFold protocol based on available cell or panel-image identifiers is used to reduce identifiable leakage across folds. All PEFT variants slightly outperform full fine-tuning in macro-F1 while training 26-52× fewer parameters. QLoRA_r16 achieves the highest macro-F1 score of 79.92 ± 0.75%, compared with 78.26 ± 0.94% for full fine-tuning, while training the same number of parameters as LoRA_r16 (1.060 M; 3.67% of the adapted model). QLoRA_r16 also improves F1 on the intact (+4.75 points) and surface-diffuse (+2.62 points) classes relative to full fine-tuning. This class-wise pattern suggests that quantized low-rank adaptation may influence minority and visually ambiguous categories; however, the present experiments do not isolate the independent effect of NF4 quantization from adapter rank, batch size, or optimization dynamics. Under the training configuration used, QLoRA_r16 records the lowest observed peak training GPU memory, approximately 30% below full fine-tuning (1727 MB versus 2478 MB). Because QLoRA_r16 was trained with batch size 16 whereas the other methods used batch size 32, this reduction should be interpreted as an end-to-end configuration effect rather than as the isolated effect of 4-bit quantization. Overall, the results indicate that PEFT is a promising and resource-efficient alternative to full fine-tuning for PV defect classification, although batch-matched memory experiments, direct embedded-device profiling, and cross-dataset validation remain necessary before making deployment-level claims.