ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Older Adult Movement Assessment Through Rehabilitation Software for Upper Limb Exoskeleton.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents a pilot study to analyze the effect of aging on motor performance of young adults (YAs) and older adults (OAs) through wrist movement assessment, using an upper limb rehabilitation robot (ULRR) in passive mode coupled to a maze-solving task serious video game. The proposed approach considers the use of kinematic metrics, such as ROM, path accuracy, and movement smoothness, as quantitative biomarkers that evidence differences between YAs and OAs. An experimental protocol was conducted with 20 participants: 10 OAs and 10 YAs. Standardized wrist movements corresponding to flexion (F), extension (E), radial deviation (R), and ulnar deviation (U) were assessed at each level of the maze. The kinematic analysis was based on metrics for range of motion (ROM), path accuracy, smoothness, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) in trajectory tracking. The results revealed clear differences between the groups: the YAs achieved a greater ROM and made fewer errors on mean (2.167 errors for YAs compared to 6.000 errors for OAs), and showed a lower RMSE, while the OAs showed greater smoothness in their movements, because the YAs exhibit greater variability and disturbances in movement when correcting and controlling their movements to achieve good performance, reflecting more precise motor control and a greater capacity for error correction during movements with trajectory constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.