ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Lightweight Cross-Domain Few-Shot Plant Disease Recognition Through Target-Domain Statistical Calibration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant disease recognition models trained under laboratory conditions often degrade markedly after cross-domain transfer because of the pronounced distribution gap between source and target domains and the scarcity of labeled target-domain samples. To address the transfer task from PlantVillage (PV_100) to PlantDoc, this study develops and evaluates a lightweight cross-domain few-shot plant disease recognition method under a strict PlantVillage-to-PlantDoc protocol. The method integrates EfficientNet-B0 feature extraction, cosine-similarity-based prototypical classification, and training-time target-domain BN adaptation (TBA). During training, unlabeled target-domain images are used only for BN statistical calibration, whereas inference is limited to feature extraction and prototype matching, without gradient updates or iterative optimization. Under a unified experimental protocol, the proposed method achieved cross-split mean accuracies of 42.69 ± 0.62% for one-shot and 54.24 ± 0.72% for five-shot, where ± denotes the standard deviation across three strict data splits; it outperformed ProtoNet by 7.44 and 9.43 percentage points, respectively. Ablation results indicate that TBA is the main source of performance improvement, whereas more complex adaptation strategies do not yield stable additional gains. The core encoder can be executed entirely on the NPU, with an estimated single-sample inference latency as low as 0.658 ms, indicating strong potential for encoder-level mobile deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.