ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Harnessing Machine Learning for Accelerated Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Unmet Challenges.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The process of drug discovery is one of the most expensive, time-consuming, and high-risk endeavors in modern science. Translating initial scientific insights into safe and effective therapies, supported by genomics, structural biology, and computational chemistry, typically requires more than a decade and substantial financial investment. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for improving efficiency across the drug discovery pipeline. By enabling the analysis of large and complex datasets, ML supports target identification, lead discovery, optimization, and prediction of preclinical and clinical outcomes. Its integration with experimental validation and automation is illustrated by recent advances such as protein structure prediction, AI-driven antifibrotic compound discovery, and antibiotic identification. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. Model generalizability is limited by data scarcity, heterogeneity, and hidden biases. In addition, the translation of in silico predictions into clinically validated outcomes remains a major bottleneck, and regulatory acceptance is constrained by limited model interpretability. Ethical considerations, including data privacy, equitable representation, and the potential misuse of generative models, further complicate adoption. This review examines the applications of ML across the drug discovery pipeline, with a focus on translational and regulatory considerations. It also discusses emerging directions, including hybrid physics-AI approaches, multimodal foundation models, federated learning, and explainable AI. The effective integration of ML will depend on rigorous validation, interdisciplinary collaboration, responsible data governance, and alignment with regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.