ReviewNutrients2026
Nutritional Challenges and Strategies in Obese Critically Ill Patients with Gynecological Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill obese patients with gynecological cancer represent a high-risk population with complex nutritional needs. Although excess adiposity may suggest adequate energy reserves, it often conceals sarcopenia, micronutrient deficiencies, and functional malnutrition, contributing to impaired wound healing, immune dysfunction, prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased susceptibility to infections, and adverse oncologic outcomes. Obesity-associated inflammation, insulin resistance, and tumor-driven catabolism further exacerbate metabolic stress and complicate nutritional management in the intensive care setting. Accurate nutritional assessment requires a multimodal approach incorporating body composition analysis, functional measures, and laboratory parameters, as conventional indices such as body mass index may underestimate nutritional risk. Nutritional support should be individualized and may include early enteral nutrition to preserve gut integrity, supplemental or total parenteral nutrition when gastrointestinal function is compromised, high-protein regimens, and targeted micronutrient replacement. Immunonutrition, including arginine, glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids, and nucleotides, has emerged as a promising strategy to modulate inflammation, enhance immune function, and support tissue repair. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding obesity-related metabolic dysfunction, nutritional assessment, enteral and parenteral nutrition, and immunonutrition in obese critically ill patients with gynecological cancer. It highlights the challenges associated with sarcopenic obesity and hidden malnutrition while providing a clinically relevant overview for intensivists, gynecologic oncologists, surgeons, and nutrition specialists. Early recognition of nutritional risk and implementation of individualized multimodal nutritional strategies may improve recovery and clinical outcomes. However, high-quality ICU-specific studies remain limited, and further prospective research is needed to establish evidence-based nutritional protocols and evaluate their impact on survival, treatment tolerance, and quality of life in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.