Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356169›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: Technical Foundations, Clinical Insights, and Future Directions.

Abdelrahman Hafez, Kamal Awad, Juan M Farina, Mohamed Nour, Mohamed Reyad Mohamed, Isabel G Scalia, Sherif Ahmed, Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah, Mahshad Razaghi, Laurève Chollet and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Abdelrahman HafezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Kamal AwadDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Juan M FarinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-8485
Mohamed NourDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5342-8524
Mohamed Reyad MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2973-2913
Isabel G ScaliaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6459-9767
Sherif AhmedDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Fatmaelzahraa AbdelfattahDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0758-1086
Mahshad RazaghiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-3004
Laurève CholletDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-5471
Cecilia Villa EtchegoyenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0278-2192
Ramzi IbrahimDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Balaji TamarappooDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Matthew StibDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85259, USA.
Chadi AyoubDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Reza ArsanjaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7081-4286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses is essential for guiding revascularization and improving outcomes. Although invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the gold standard for functional lesion assessment, its use is limited by procedural invasiveness, cost, and complexity. CT-derived FFR (FFRct), based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), was the first major advance in noninvasive physiological assessment, but its adoption has been hindered by intensive off-site computation and dependence on high-quality imaging. This review summarizes the evolution from invasive FFR to AI-driven functional assessment of coronary lesions. We examine the principles and validation of CFD-based FFRct and then focus on the shift toward artificial intelligence, including both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches. These methods range from models using engineered geometric and plaque features trained on large synthetic datasets to end-to-end systems that learn directly from imaging data. We discuss key validation studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and clinical utility, with attention to performance in challenging settings such as intermediate stenoses, heavy calcification, and patients with comorbidities. We also highlight major barriers to widespread adoption, including dependence on input data quality, limited explainability, regulatory hurdles, and integration into clinical workflows. Finally, we outline future directions, including AI-enabled virtual PCI planning, multimodal risk stratification, and broader access to functional cardiac assessment. AI has the potential to transform noninvasive coronary imaging by enabling a single CCTA scan to provide rapid, integrated evaluation of anatomy, plaque characteristics, and physiological significance, supporting more personalized care and better clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCoronary Artery DiseaseFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMachine LearningSoft Computingartificial intelligencecoronary artery diseasedeep learningfractional flow reservefunctional assessmentnon-invasive imaging

Identifiers

PMID42356169
PMCPMC13302996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.