ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
The First and Final Answer: Left Internal Thoracic Artery-to-Left Anterior Descending Artery Bypass and the Reappraisal of Coronary Revascularization.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical intervention for ischemic heart disease began approximately 150 years ago with nitrates, and for nearly a century thereafter, little fundamental progress was made. With the advent of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery (LITA-LAD) bypass in the 1960s, treatment entered a new stage; however, its essential significance remained insufficiently recognized for many years. Numerous studies were subsequently conducted to evaluate alternative or parallel treatment strategies, but these investigations also helped bring the durable capacity of LITA-LAD to perfuse ischemic myocardium into sharper focus. Over the past quarter century, the treatment of ischemic heart disease has remained in a state of uncertainty, and its central prognostic foundation has often been obscured, although in recent years this uncertainty has begun to resolve. In this review, we reexamine the historical process by which the significance of LITA-LAD remained incompletely appreciated in parts of the cardiology and cardiac surgical communities. We further outline how the principal basis of the long-term prognostic benefit conferred by LITA-LAD gradually became evident and define the contemporary roles of medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to LITA-LAD-based coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.