ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Persistent Hypercoagulability After Radical Prostatectomy: Biomarker Dynamics and Implications for Individualized Thromboprophylaxis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinically relevant complication of radical prostatectomy despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Current thromboprophylaxis strategies are largely based on fixed-duration approaches and static risk models focused on the early postoperative period. However, accumulating evidence suggests that postoperative hypercoagulability is a dynamic and prolonged process that may extend beyond this timeframe. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms and temporal dynamics of postoperative hypercoagulability after radical prostatectomy, with particular emphasis on biomarker-based evidence, including thrombin generation and von Willebrand factor. Clinical and laboratory findings suggest that haemostatic activation may persist after hospital discharge, supporting the concept of a biologically relevant post-discharge period during which insufficiently captured thrombotic risk may remain despite apparent clinical recovery. Current risk assessment models do not account for the time-dependent nature of postoperative haemostatic changes and do not incorporate biomarker data. This discrepancy highlights a gap between guideline-based thromboprophylaxis strategies and the underlying biological processes. To address this, we propose a conceptual framework in which postoperative thromboprophylaxis is considered in relation to the temporal evolution of hypercoagulability. This framework is hypothesis-generating and may help inform future studies aimed at identifying patients who could benefit from extended prophylaxis while avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation in those with more rapid haemostatic recovery. Further prospective studies are required to validate biomarker-guided strategies and to define clinically actionable thresholds for individualized thromboprophylaxis in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.