ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Torque Teno Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Perspectives on Its Role as a Complementary Marker in Monitoring Net Immunosuppression.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients remains challenging, as conventional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) reflects pharmacokinetic exposure rather than the overall functional immune state. Torque teno virus (TTV), a non-pathogenic virus, has emerged as a potential complementary biomarker of the net state of immunosuppression. This review evaluates the current evidence regarding the utility of TTV load in this context, focusing on its correlation with standard pharmacokinetic markers, the analytical performance of quantitative PCR assays, its role as an integrated marker of immunosuppression, and its predictive value for clinical outcomes. Available data indicate that TTV load shows weak and inconsistent correlations with individual drug levels, such as tacrolimus trough concentrations, supporting its role as a complementary rather than substitutive tool. qPCR-based assays demonstrate generally good sensitivity and reproducibility, although inter-assay variability and lack of standardization remain important limitations. Clinically, higher TTV levels have been associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections, whereas lower levels have been linked to acute rejection, suggesting a potential association between TTV viremia and immune status. TTV monitoring may represent a promising complementary approach for a more individualized assessment of immunosuppression. However, further prospective and interventional studies are required to validate standardized thresholds and determine whether TTV-guided strategies improve transplant outcomes compared with conventional monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.