Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355641›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Balancing Risk and Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Complications in Delayed Breast Reconstruction.

Lamorna Coyle, Gabrielle Odoom, Ilexa Schechter, Neil Tanna, Joseph A Ricci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lamorna CoyleDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3381-819X
Gabrielle OdoomDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, NY 11004, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8582-1743
Ilexa SchechterDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA.
Neil TannaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, NY 11004, USA.
Joseph A RicciDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Queens, NY 11004, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer accounts for nearly one in four cancer diagnoses amongst women, with 36-50% of patients electing to undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Though immediate reconstruction has risen in popularity due to higher patient satisfaction scores, factors such as individual patient anatomy, patient preference, and adjuvant oncologic treatments may preclude this option for some patients. In such circumstances, a delayed approach to reconstruction offers a promising alternative, often offering comparable aesthetic results with lower rates of major complications. Autologous, implant-based, and hybrid reconstructive techniques may all be applied in a delayed setting at a time point clinically distinct from oncologic resection, with each technique carrying unique advantages and risks that must be evaluated in the context of patient-specific factors. By providing an overview of common complications associated with various delayed breast reconstruction modalities, this review seeks to synthesize the current approaches to prevention, management, and treatment of reconstructive obstacles and outcomes to foster shared decision-making, individualized surgical planning, and optimal reconstructive results.

Indexed as

delayed breast reconstructiondelayed DIEP flap reconstructionimplant-based reconstructionreconstruction after mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID42355641
PMCPMC13302269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.