ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Critically Ill Neonates and Children: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic Strategies in Pediatric Care: Addressing Rare Diseases in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is widely used to detect chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variants (CNVs) in pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or developmental concerns. However, its diagnostic utility in critically ill neonates and children admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) remains undercharacterized. We conducted a retrospective review of 679 patients admitted to the neonatal, pediatric, or cardiovascular intensive care units (NICU, PICU, CVICU) at Phoenix Children's Hospital between 2019 and 2024 who underwent CMA. Demographic data, clinical indications, and CMA results were extracted from electronic medical records to assess diagnostic yield and variant patterns. CMA identified a clinically relevant finding in 102 of 679 patients, resulting in an overall diagnostic yield of 15.0% (95% CI: 12.3-17.7%). Clinically relevant findings included pathogenic (P) variants (n = 88), likely pathogenic (LP) variants (n = 12), and large regions of absence of heterozygosity (AOH) consistent with uniparental disomy (UPD) (n = 2). A variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was detected in 139 patients (20.5%). Among the pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants, CMA identified recurrent CNVs (n = 49), nonrecurrent CNVs (n = 17), aneuploidies (n = 22), and patients with two pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs (n = 10). Diagnostic yields of 48.4% (95% CI: 38.5-58.4%) and 8.4% (95% CI: 6.0-11.5%) were observed in patients with single or multiple congenital anomalies including a congenital heart defect (CA + CHD), and in patients with an isolated CHD, respectively. CMA demonstrates significant diagnostic value in critically ill neonates and children, particularly among those with multisystem congenital anomalies. These findings support the routine integration of CMA in genomic evaluation protocols for ICU populations to guide diagnosis, management, and counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.