Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355552›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Impact of Radiomics Parameters and Clinical Integration on Prognostication in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study.

Hajar Moradmand, Jason Molitoris, Ranee Mehra, Lisa Schumaker, Erin Allor, Daria A Gaykalova, Lei Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hajar MoradmandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-468X
Jason MolitorisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Ranee MehraMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Lisa SchumakerMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-9660
Erin AllorInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Daria A GaykalovaInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Lei RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2384-5676

Funding

Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Luigi Marchionni · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
Study of Biological and Radiographic Biomarkers and Association with Ancestry and Survival Disparities in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using AI ApproachesR01DE033426 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Daria A Gaykalova, Ranee Mehra · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NIH Common Fund R01CA279013-28NIH Common Fund R01DE033426NIH Common Fund R01EB032680-27NIH Common Fund U54CA273956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics has the potential to improve risk stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but clinical adoption is limited by inconsistent performance across institutions. A key source of variability is how radiomic features are generated, preprocessed, and selected prior to model development. This multicenter study evaluated how radiomics parameterization and feature selection strategies affect external model performance, feature stability, and time-to-event risk stratification. We studied pre-treatment CT scans from 752 patients with primary HNSCC from three hospitals. For each scan, 1648 radiomic features were computed using 20 different preparation methods that varied in scaling, outlier removal, and gray-level bin width. We compared five feature selection methods: Graph-FS with connected components, Boruta, Lasso, RFE-RF, and mRMR. The classification models used were Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and Logistic Regression. We measured performance using external ROC-AUC, bootstrap confidence intervals, Brier score, and RobustScore. Stability of feature selection was assessed using the Kuncheva and Jaccard indices. Cox proportional hazards models confirmed time-to-event results, and consensus SHAP analysis helped explain the models. Radiomics parameterization influenced model performance, and no single configuration was optimal across all analyses. Radiomics-only models outperformed clinical-only models, while clinical-radiomics models achieved the highest overall performance. mRMR and Lasso produced the highest average external AUCs, while Graph-FS showed the greatest stability. The best classification model achieved an external AUC of 0.817. In Cox validation, the best clinical-radiomics configuration achieved an external C-index of 0.662 and separated high- and low-risk patients in the external cohort.

Indexed as

Cox survival analysisfeature stabilityhead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID42355552
PMCPMC13302689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.