ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ultrasound Measurement of Plantar Fascia Thickness: A Learning Curve Analysis Between a Novice and an Expert Examiner.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore interobserver differences, intraobserver consistency, and temporal changes in ultrasound-based plantar fascia thickness measurements between an experienced musculoskeletal sonographer and a student examiner. Additionally, the study described the student's longitudinal progression during the measurement acquisition period under supervised conditions. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional, descriptive observational study included 84 adults, of whom 42 presented plantar fasciopathy and 42 had no history of heel pain. All participants underwent ultrasound assessment of plantar fascia thickness performed by two observers-a novice student and an expert examiner-each obtaining two measurements per participant. Statistical analyses focused on detecting differences between observers and temporal changes in measurement performance. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to further explore agreement.
resultsIn the overall analysis, no statistically significant differences were detected at the group level between student and expert measurements. However, when analyses were stratified by time periods, statistically significant differences were observed during the initial phase (November-December 2024;
conclusionsThese findings suggest a progressive reduction in measurement differences between observers over time, consistent with a learning-related effect. However, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and do not constitute evidence of formal interobserver reliability. The findings highlight the potential importance of structured ultrasound training and supervised practice in improving agreement between observers in both clinical and educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.