Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355459›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Distant Landmarks Used for Navigation by Homing Pigeons.

Martin Wikelski, Dina K N Dechmann, Michael Quetting, Georg Heine, Wolfgang Fiedler, Heidi Schmid, Gil Bohrer, Anna Gagliardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin WikelskiDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9790-7025
Dina K N DechmannDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
Michael QuettingDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
Georg HeineDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
Wolfgang FiedlerDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-4161
Heidi SchmidDepartment of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
Gil BohrerCivil Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9209-9540
Anna GagliardoDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

Max Planck Society Wikelski Dept
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How animals navigate using single or several sensory modalities remains disputed. Humans often use distant landmarks such as mountain peaks as visual cues for orientation. Whether animals can also rely on distant visual cues while excluding other modalities, such as smell or visual maps, is difficult to test under natural conditions. We investigated this by releasing trained homing pigeons above thick ground fog from a plane. Birds were first trained to home individually from two ground sites, each ~15 km from their loft. Subsequently, trained individuals were released from a plane ~400 m above the terrestrial release sites during sunny conditions. This was followed by two experimental release conditions above continuous ground fog. Above the fog, pigeons cannot use a map or olfactory location cues, but may potentially use magnetic cues. When all landmarks were hidden by ground fog, pigeons showed poor orientation, tortuous flight paths, and descended through the fog within four min, advancing only ~0.1 km (0.1% of the distance) towards home. They subsequently waited for solar cues to continue homing. By contrast, when distant landmarks (alpine mountain tops) were visible, pigeons maintained strong homeward orientation, flying for 20 min and covering 96% of the distance to home, similar to ground-level controls (17 min, 80%). These results demonstrate that when known olfactory cues or local maps are excluded, distant landmarks-but not magnetic cues-enable efficient short-distance homing in experienced pigeons.

Indexed as

Alpsboundary layerColumba liviadistant landmarkshoming flightmagneticmountain rangenavigationolfactoryorientationstratus fog

Identifiers

PMID42355459
PMCPMC13300779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.