Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355432›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Ultrasonographic Gallbladder Findings and Bile Culture Results in Dogs with Extrahepatic Biliary Disorders: A Retrospective Exploratory Case Series.

Andrei Răzvan Codea, Alexandra Biriş, Mihaela Niculae, Romeo Popa, Daniela Mihaela Neagu, Cristian Popovici, Radu Lăcătuș, Mircea Mircean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrei Răzvan CodeaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandra BirişDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-749X
Mihaela NiculaeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4181-0259
Romeo PopaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Petru Rareș 2-4, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Daniela Mihaela NeaguDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-3887
Cristian PopoviciDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3661-5982
Radu LăcătușDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mircea MirceanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Mănăștur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-0726-563X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of bacterial infection in canine extrahepatic biliary disease remains inconsistently characterized. This retrospective case series evaluated associations between ultrasonographic gallbladder findings and bile culture results in dogs. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-seven dogs were screened between March 2024 and December 2025, of which 49 met inclusion criteria (clinical, biochemical, and ultrasonographic evidence of gallbladder disease) and underwent bile sampling by ultrasound-guided cholecystocentesis (n = 45) or intraoperative collection (n = 4). Samples were cultured aerobically and anaerobically; isolates identified by MALDI-TOF MS were further tested for

resultsAmong the 49 included dogs, ultrasonography identified cholecystitis (75.5%), cholelithiasis (16.3%), and biliary mucocele (8.2%). Bile cultures were positive in 43/49 dogs (87.8%), yielding only aerobic bacteria.

conclusionsIn this selected referral population, bacterial isolates were frequently recovered from bile samples, particularly in dogs with cholecystitis. Prospective studies involving larger populations are warranted to confirm these results, define the bacterial prevalence and clinical significance of bacterial colonization or infection, and further refine evidence-based diagnostic and treatment strategies for dogs with extrahepatic biliary disease.

Indexed as

bacterial pathogensbile culturebiliary mucocelecholecystitischolelithiasisdogin vitro antimicrobial susceptibilityultrasound-guided cholecystocentesis

Identifiers

PMID42355432
PMCPMC13302599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.