Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355388›Full record

ReviewInsects2026

Insects as an Alternative Protein Source: A Sustainable Approach to Future Food Security.

Mohd Suhail Banday, Ambashree Dubey, Neha Thakur, Saima Banday, Jyoti Jawla, Jameel Ahmad, Esteban Pérez-García, Ariana Saraiva, Hmidan A Alturki, António Raposo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohd Suhail BandayDivision of Livestock Products Technology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly 243122, India.ORCID 0009-0003-5936-9224
Ambashree DubeyDivision of Livestock Products Technology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly 243122, India.
Neha ThakurDepartment of Livestock Products Technology, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar 125004, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-4428
Saima BandayDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, Jammu 181102, India.
Jyoti JawlaDivision of Livestock Products Technology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly 243122, India.
Jameel AhmadDivision of Livestock Products Technology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly 243122, India.ORCID 0009-0007-4141-5017
Esteban Pérez-GarcíaDepartment of Animal Pathology and Production, Bromatology and Food Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-6489-7789
Ariana SaraivaResearch in Veterinary Medicine (I-MVET), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lisbon University Centre, Lusófona University, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.
Hmidan A AlturkiKing Abdulaziz City for Science & Technology, Wellness and Preventive Medicine Institute-Health Sector, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-063X
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), ECTS (School of Health Sciences and Technologies), Lusófona University, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-2249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible insects are increasingly recognized as a viable alternative protein source, offering a potentially sustainable approach to addressing global food security challenges. This narrative review critically examines the nutritional composition, environmental advantages, techno-functional attributes, and potential applications of insect-based proteins within human food systems. Edible insects are characterized by high protein content, favourable essential amino acid profiles, and appreciable levels of key micronutrients, rendering them nutritionally comparable to conventional livestock-derived proteins. Moreover, insect production systems generally require substantially lower inputs of land, water, and feed, resulting in comparatively lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduced overall environmental burden. Despite these advantages, broader adoption remains constrained by challenges related to regulatory heterogeneity, food safety concerns, and limited consumer acceptance. Overall, the available evidence suggests that edible insects can function as a nutritionally adequate and environmentally sustainable complementary protein source; however, significant variability in nutrient composition, limitations in standardized safety assessment, and socio-cultural barriers currently restrict their large-scale integration into mainstream food systems. In addition, inconsistencies in analytical methodologies and reliance on in vitro data further complicate cross-study comparisons and translational relevance. Future research should focus on standardization of rearing and processing conditions, harmonization of evaluation frameworks (e.g., protein quality indices), comprehensive safety assessments, and well-designed clinical studies to validate nutritional and functional benefits, alongside the development of effective strategies to improve consumer acceptance and support regulatory alignment across regions.

Indexed as

alternative proteinconsumer acceptanceedible insectsentomophagyenvironmental impactfood securitynutritionsustainability

Identifiers

PMID42355388
PMCPMC13300007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.