In one paragraphArticle in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Montserrat Cervantes-EspinozaLaboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.
Edwin R Ariza-MarínColección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9469-6034 Tonatiuh Santos-NeriaColección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Mauricio Pérez-SilvaColección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.
Rodolfo J Cancino-LópezFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Linares 67700, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3213-0371 Osiris Valerio-MendozaColección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-0734-5739 Alba R Dueñas-CedilloFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Linares 67700, Mexico.
Enrico Alejandro RuizLaboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-8199 Luis Gerardo Cuellar-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Linares 67700, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-611X Israel Yerena-YamallelFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Linares 67700, Mexico.
Francisco Armendáriz-ToledanoColección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-4440 Funding
PAPIIT-UNAM IA201720PAPIIT-UNAM IA203122PAPIIT-UNAM IN223924PRONAII PRONAII-2024-3SECTIHTI 139030SIP-IPN SIP20231006
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Morphological characters are widely used for species delimitation in Scolytinae, yet their stability under intraspecific variation remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed phenotypic variation in specimens currently assigned to
Indexed as
bark beetlesintraspecific differencesMexican cypressphenotypic variationsexual dimorphism
Identifiers
PMID42355358
PMCPMC13300303
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390