ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Control Shear Banding in Metallic Glasses to Enable Tensile Ductility: A Brief Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metallic glasses (MGs) exhibit excellent mechanical properties, yet their poor tensile ductility greatly limits their practical applications as structural and functional materials. Shear banding is a typical localized rheological deformation behavior inherent to amorphous materials, which stems from heterogeneous atomic rearrangement and regional viscosity fluctuations in the glassy matrix, and fundamentally determines the macroscopic mechanical properties of MGs and their composites. This review discusses the relationship between typical toughening strategies and shear banding behavior, and proposes that deliberate suppression of shear band (SB) initiation or deceleration of their rapid propagation can effectively promote distributed plastic flow. In this review, nanosizing and metamaterial strategies are shown to hinder the formation of mature SBs, while metallic glass matrix composites (MGMCs), nanoglasses (NGs), notched design, and rejuvenation treatments contribute to restraining SB propagation. Current approaches have successfully regulated shear banding behavior and thereby realized appreciable tensile ductility in MGs. Novel design and fabrication techniques for amorphous alloys, which suppress SB initiation and retard SB propagation to achieve homogeneous plastic flow, open up new avenues for realizing controllable plasticity of MGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.