ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Dent Defects on Steel Energy Pipelines: Evaluation Criteria, Integrity Prediction, and Future Challenges.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to climate change, corrosive conditions, and hydrogen-rich environments, steel energy pipelines inevitably develop a variety of defects. These deficiencies compromise pipeline safety and reliability, and neglecting them may result in pipeline leaks, fractures, and even potentially catastrophic explosions. Although a considerable body of literature reviews the effects of metal-loss defects like corrosion and cracks on pipeline safety and reliability, the impact of geometric deformation, like dents, lacks a comprehensive review. This work employs a hybrid systematic literature review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis (BA) to investigate the current research status of pipeline dent assessment. Four questions are answered: (1) What are the publication distribution characteristics, active journals, production organizations, and production authors related to research on pipeline dents? (2) What criteria have been employed for evaluating the pipeline dent? (3) From what perspective has the integrity of dented pipelines been assessed, and what research approaches have been used? (4) What are the future challenges and prospects of pipeline dent studies? The findings demonstrate that depth-, strain-, and damage-based evaluation criteria are widely employed to assess pipeline dents, each with merits and limitations. Despite the simplicity and ease of use of depth- and strain-based criteria, they are prone to underestimation flaws. In contrast, damage-based criteria, which consider multiple factors, are limited by their complexity and high computational resource requirements. The reliability of dented pipelines is predicted with remaining strength, fatigue life, and failure pressure using theoretical modeling, experimental testing, numerical simulation, or a combination of these methods. Future dent studies should involve refining numerical models, full-scale testing under varied loading conditions, and integrating advanced sensing techniques for real-time inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.