Correlation Between T

Juan Yu, Zhaohui Feng, Guoai Li, Quanyi Xue, Sai Tang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan YuBeijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Applications, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China.

Zhaohui FengBeijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Applications, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China.

Guoai LiBeijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Aluminum Alloys and Applications, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China.

Quanyi XueNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High-Strength Structural Materials, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Sai TangNational Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on High-Strength Structural Materials, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to identify the optimal aging regime that balances strength and intergranular corrosion (IGC) resistance in a 2060 Al-Li alloy under T8 temper. The evolution of microstructure, mechanical properties, and IGC behavior was systematically investigated across various aging conditions. The most relevant results show that the optimal regime for the 3% pre-stretched alloy is 150 °C for 32-48 h. At the peak-aged state (150 °C/48 h), the alloy achieves a yield strength (YS) of 521 MPa and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 541 MPa in the longitudinal (L) direction, and 486 MPa and 548 MPa in the long-transverse (LT) direction, with elongations of 11.1% and 12.2%, respectively. Under this condition, the corrosion mode shifts from IGC to pitting, with a maximum pitting depth of 98.6 μm. Microstructural analyses confirm that the T

Indexed as

2060 Al–Li alloyintergranular corrosionmechanical propertiesT1 precipitationT8 aging treatment

Identifiers

PMID42355179

DOI10.3390/ma19122598

PMCPMC13303513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.