ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Optimization of Orthodontic Materials: A Clinical Perspective on Current State and Future Directions.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed orthodontic diagnosis, yet its application to orthodontic materials science remains critically underexplored. This perspective identifies and characterizes the AI-materials integration gap as the central unresolved problem in digital orthodontics: AI-optimized treatment plans are currently executed through empirically selected materials whose mechanical behavior is never modeled by the planning system. We examine four domains where this gap is consequential: thermoplastic aligner polymers (PETG vs. TPU), where supervised ANNs can predict force decay from polymer composition; NiTi archwire alloys, where Bayesian optimization and Gaussian process regression are accelerating alloy design; additive manufacturing of orthodontic devices, where supervised ML reduced print-parameter optimization burden in a 2025 five-variable surface roughness study; and AI-driven biological response prediction, where FEA-surrogate neural networks reduced biomechanical computation from minutes to milliseconds per patient query. A scoping review of clear aligner AI identified 41 studies-none addressing aligner material properties as a primary outcome. We argue that closing the AI-materials gap requires standardized open material-performance datasets; FEA-surrogate models integrating polymer stiffness as a treatment-planning input; patient-specific digital twins with defined material, mechanical, and biological parameter layers; and federated learning infrastructure spanning clinics and manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.