ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Study on the Influence Mechanism of Mineral Admixtures on Hydration and Microstructure of Yellow River Sediment-Based Shotcrete.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the effects and mechanisms of three mineral admixtures-fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), and metakaolin (MK)-on the fresh, mechanical, and microstructural properties of Yellow River sediment (YRS)-based shotcrete. A comprehensive experimental program was conducted, including setting time determination, workability assessment, and mechanical strength evaluation, complemented by microstructural characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results indicate that the incorporation of FA prolonged initial and final setting times and improved pumpability but reduced build-up thickness and compressive strength; splitting tensile strength at later ages remained comparable to the control. SF shortened the final setting time and reduced flowability but enhanced shootability, layer build-up, and medium- to later-age compressive and tensile strengths, with an optimal dosage of 5%. MK accelerated the final setting time, slightly reduced early-age compressive strength, but improved early-age splitting tensile strength and achieved 28-day compressive strength comparable to the control. Microstructural analyses revealed that FA participates in pozzolanic reactions forming C-(A)-S-H gel, while SF and MK promote the formation of dense C-S-H and carboalumination phases, enhancing matrix densification. Based on performance evaluation, the recommended dosages are FA ≤ 20%, SF ≤ 15%, and MK ≤ 15%. These results establish clear links between macroscopic performance and microstructural evolution, providing experimental guidance for the sustainable development of YRS-based shotcrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.