ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning Prediction of the Compressive Bearing Capacity of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes Using Random Forest.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) members are widely used in long-span and high-rise structures due to their high load-bearing capacity and structural efficiency. Accurate prediction of their compressive bearing capacity is essential for reliable design. In this study, a data-driven prediction model based on the Random Forest (RF) algorithm was developed using a database of 154 axial compression tests. A total of 24 parameters, including geometric dimensions, material properties, and sectional characteristics, were considered as input variables, and the model was optimized through five-fold cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning. The results indicate that the proposed model achieves high accuracy and stability, with mean predicted-to-experimental ratios of 1.002 and 0.989 for the training and testing sets, respectively, and maximum deviations within 15%. Compared with existing design codes and alternative machine learning methods, the RF model improves prediction accuracy by approximately 9% and exhibits strong generalization capability. Furthermore, independent experimental validation using nine CFST column tests confirms its reliability, with prediction errors within 5%. These findings demonstrate that the proposed model provides an effective and practical tool for predicting the compressive bearing capacity of CFST members in engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.