Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355075›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recovery of Platinum Group Metals from Spent Automotive Catalysts: A Review of Processes and Challenges.

Minghui Liu, Chunzhen Yang, Ming Tian, Yutong Zhao, Xianghui Liu, Chenyu Zhan, Zihan Li, Tianyan Xue, Faquan He, Hongliang Wang and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Minghui LiuChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Chunzhen YangChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Ming TianNational Engineering Research Center of Green Recycling for Strategic Metal Resources, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yutong ZhaoEfficient Electrolysis Group, Fuel Cell System and Engineering Laboratory, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
Xianghui LiuChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Chenyu ZhanChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Zihan LiChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Tianyan XueNational Engineering Research Center of Green Recycling for Strategic Metal Resources, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3707-1828
Faquan HeChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Hongliang WangChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.
Jianhui YangChina Energy Longyuan Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Beijing 100039, China.

Funding

Key Technology Development and Demonstration Program for Bulk Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Utilization of China Energy Investment Corporation Co., Ltd. GJNY-23-31-2National Key Research and Development Program of China 2020YFB0408602National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFB3504304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platinum group metals (PGMs: Pt, Pd, Rh, Ru, Os, Ir) are critical strategic metals. Spent automotive catalysts (SACs) represent one of the most significant secondary sources of PGMs, and their recovery is essential for alleviating the supply-demand imbalance. In the recycling chain, pyrometallurgical processing of SACs generates Fe-Si-based alloy concentrates (termed Fe-Si-PGMs), serving as an important yet challenging intermediate resource for PGM recovery. This review first summarizes the pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes used for recovering PGMs from SACs, before shifting its focus to the treatment technologies for PGMs in Fe-Si-PGMs alloy. These techniques, including direct extraction, extraction following desilication (via alkaline roasting, slagging, or hydrometallurgical routes), and in situ mechanochemical extraction, are critically evaluated in terms of their advantages and limitations. Furthermore, given that the accurate quantification of trace-level yet high-value PGMs represents another key challenge in the recovery chain due to complex sample matrices, this work systematically outlines and compares the analytical methods commonly employed, such as fire assay, spectroscopic and mass spectrometric techniques, electrochemical methods, and alkali fusion. Finally, several recommendations are provided regarding PGM recovery from SACs, with emphasis on Fe-Si-PGMs alloy processing and analytical methods for PGMs.

Indexed as

Fe−Si−PGMs alloyPGM analytical methodsplatinum group metalsresource recyclingspent automotive catalysts

Identifiers

PMID42355075
PMCPMC13303045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.