Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355046›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning-Enabled Layer-Wise Melting Quality Recognition for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process via In Situ Monitoring.

Yuan Liu, Bowei Zou, Zhizhou Zhang, Yongxing Zhang, Shiqing Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan LiuSchool of Mechanics and Construction Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Bowei ZouElectric Power Dispatching and Control Center of Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510600, China.
Zhizhou ZhangSchool of Mechanics and Construction Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Yongxing ZhangSchool of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4403-8126
Shiqing HuangSchool of Mechanics and Construction Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8313-1265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has emerged as a core metal additive manufacturing technology for high-end sectors, including aerospace and medical device manufacturing. However, melting anomalies that occur during fabrication accumulate layer by layer, leading to degraded surface quality and impaired mechanical performance of as-built components-a critical bottleneck limiting their large-scale industrial adoption. Accurate and robust layer-wise melting quality recognition remains a challenge due to the complex surface morphologies induced by such melting anomalies. This study presents a machine learning-enabled in situ monitoring approach for layer-wise melting quality identification in L-PBF. By systematically varying laser power and scanning speed, 24 parameter combinations were designed to fabricate specimens with three distinct melting states: over-melting (OM), lack of fusion (LOF), and normal melting. A high-resolution complementary meta-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera was used to capture layer-wise surface images of the specimens, and following abnormal layer filtering and manual validation, a high-quality dataset comprising 5110 layer-wise images was constructed. Two mainstream machine learning approaches were systematically evaluated and optimized for melting quality classification: a support vector machine (SVM) model leveraging handcrafted gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features achieved a classification accuracy of 96.77%, while a convolutional neural network (CNN) model with end-to-end feature learning directly from raw images attained a superior accuracy of 98.14%. In terms of computational efficiency, the CNN model exhibited a faster inference speed with a per-layer inference time of just 0.036 s, nearly half that of the SVM model (0.068 s per layer). Most critically, the CNN model completely eliminated fatal cross-class misclassification between OM and LOF-an error mode common in the SVM model that would trigger erroneous process corrective actions in practical industrial applications. The findings demonstrate that image-based machine learning provides a reliable technical foundation for intelligent in situ monitoring of the L-PBF process. With its high accuracy, strong robustness, and superior computational efficiency, the CNN model can effectively support on-site operational decision-making, reduce material and time losses, and enhance process stability in industrial settings, thus exhibiting significant potential for practical engineering deployment.

Indexed as

defects classificationin situ monitoringlaser powder bed fusionmachine learningmelting quality recognition

Identifiers

PMID42355046
PMCPMC13301922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.