ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Research on Density Prediction of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters for IN718 Nickel-Based Superalloy Based on Machine Learning.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of modeling the complex non-linear relationship between process parameters and relative density in selective laser melting (SLM) of IN718 nickel-based superalloy under small-sample conditions. A data-driven prediction framework integrating data augmentation, physics-informed feature engineering, machine learning, and model interpretability analysis was developed and systematically validated. Fourteen sets of experimental data covering both vertical and horizontal building directions were collected by varying laser power (P), scan speed (v), and hatch spacing (h). To overcome the small-sample limitation, three augmentation strategies-radial basis function (RBF) interpolation, generative adversarial network (GAN), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)-were systematically compared under unified physical constraints combining local perturbation and volumetric energy density (E_vol) filtering, with Pearson correlation coefficient consistency used to select the optimal strategy. Eight physically meaningful input features were constructed, including E_vol and line energy density (E_line), explicitly embedding SLM process physics into the learning framework. Support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and their hyperparameters were systematically optimized via exhaustive grid search combined with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV), ensuring robust model selection under small-sample constraints. A physics-based baseline model (E_vol quadratic fitting, LOO-CV average R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.