ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Electromechanical Impedance Data-Driven Metal Structural Tensile Stress Identification Using Generative Adversarial Networks.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning networks facilitate automated metal material/structural stress identification when employing the electromechanical impedance/admittance (EMI/EMA) of piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) transducers, while insufficient data quantity and low quality usually restrict the performance of data-driven deep networks. To address this problem, this paper innovatively proposed an original data enhancement method using the EMA generative adversarial network (EMAGAN) to overcome measurement data inefficiency and deficiency for deep learning-based stress identification, which is difficult to accomplish using the traditional EMA technique. In this method, a novel data-normalized algorithm was tuned to collaboratively foster the EMAGAN-based dataset generation. Then, the synthetic datasets incorporated with original ones were fed into an adaptively established one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) for accurate stress prediction. A validating experiment was performed on an aluminum beam specimen subjected to uniaxial tensile load until failure, which was continuously monitored via two surface-bonded PZT transducers. The efficacy of the generated EMA datasets was evaluated through comparison with the raw ones in terms of statistical errors and deep learning-based aluminum structural stress identification. The results demonstrated that the EMAGAN generated high-accuracy EMA data which exceeded 380 times that of the normal collection method, and the EMAGAN paired with 1DCNN provides a promising way for EMA data-driven metal structural stress identification with high efficiency, intelligence and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.