Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355013›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Residual Stress Relief in Metallic Materials: Traditional Methods, Emerging Techniques, and Multi-Field Synergies.

Shushan Hu, Gang Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shushan HuDepartment of Mechanical and Traffic Engineering, Ordos Institute of Technology, Ordos 017000, China.
Gang HuangSchool of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2025MS05092Ordos institute of Technology KYLJ25Z003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual stress, an inevitable byproduct of manufacturing processes, significantly compromises the mechanical integrity, formability, and dimensional stability of metallic components. A comprehensive understanding of residual stress evolution and effective mitigation strategies is therefore critical for preventing structural failure. This review systematically examines the generation mechanisms, multi-scale classifications, and performance impacts of residual stresses in metallic structures. We critically evaluate the evolution of stress relief technologies, transitioning from traditional thermal and mechanical methods-which often suffer from high energy consumption, environmental concerns, or geometric distortion-to emerging non-thermal single-field techniques such as ultrasonic, magnetic, and electropulsing treatments. Crucially, this paper highlights a paradigm shift toward multi-field coupling strategies. By synergistically integrating thermal, magnetic, and vibrational energies, novel approaches like Combined Magnetic-Vibration (CMVSR), Thermal-Vibration (TVSR), and Thermal-Magnetic (TMSR) stress relief demonstrate superior stress relaxation efficacy while maintaining microstructural stability and minimizing energy expenditures. Ultimately, this review provides a comprehensive roadmap for selecting appropriate mitigation strategies and outlines the future trajectory of eco-friendly, high-efficiency stress relief in advanced manufacturing.

Indexed as

magnetic–vibration stress reliefmechanical propertiesmulti-field couplingresidual stressstress relief technologies

Identifiers

PMID42355013
PMCPMC13301809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.