ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Residual Stress Relief in Metallic Materials: Traditional Methods, Emerging Techniques, and Multi-Field Synergies.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Residual stress, an inevitable byproduct of manufacturing processes, significantly compromises the mechanical integrity, formability, and dimensional stability of metallic components. A comprehensive understanding of residual stress evolution and effective mitigation strategies is therefore critical for preventing structural failure. This review systematically examines the generation mechanisms, multi-scale classifications, and performance impacts of residual stresses in metallic structures. We critically evaluate the evolution of stress relief technologies, transitioning from traditional thermal and mechanical methods-which often suffer from high energy consumption, environmental concerns, or geometric distortion-to emerging non-thermal single-field techniques such as ultrasonic, magnetic, and electropulsing treatments. Crucially, this paper highlights a paradigm shift toward multi-field coupling strategies. By synergistically integrating thermal, magnetic, and vibrational energies, novel approaches like Combined Magnetic-Vibration (CMVSR), Thermal-Vibration (TVSR), and Thermal-Magnetic (TMSR) stress relief demonstrate superior stress relaxation efficacy while maintaining microstructural stability and minimizing energy expenditures. Ultimately, this review provides a comprehensive roadmap for selecting appropriate mitigation strategies and outlines the future trajectory of eco-friendly, high-efficiency stress relief in advanced manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.