ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Global Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Narrative Review.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are a public health problem worldwide. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize and to provide a comprehensive overview of the current surveillance methods used in LTCFs. We conducted a search of the PubMed database starting from 2000 onward. We found 324 articles that were systematically evaluated by the titles, abstracts, and full texts, and we selected 42 records. These articles were dispersed across North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. We identified articles describing the results from active or passive surveillance and from a point prevalence study (PPS). The most frequently used method was PPSs in 30 studies, followed by 12 articles reporting active surveillance results and 3 articles describing active surveillance findings. The case definitions applied in 16 articles were those provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, followed by the McGeer and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control definitions in 15 and 13, respectively. Twenty-six studies described the method used to calculate the HAI indicator (incidence, incidence density, or prevalence). The articles on PPSs reported prevalence per 100 patients (22 articles), whereas those on active and passive surveillance reported the incidence density per 1000 patient-days. PPSs effectively identified HAIs in LTCFs through standardized data collection and essential interpretive information. The variability in surveillance methods, case definitions, HAI types, and indicator calculation approaches highlights the need for standardized surveillance protocols and methodologies in LTCFs worldwide. Furthermore, these findings emphasize the importance of implementing appropriate surveillance systems and targeted public health measures to effectively address the specific needs and vulnerabilities of the LTCF population in our country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.