ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Effects of Dietary Concentrate-to-Roughage Ratio on Rumen Microbiota, Functional Profiles, and Fermentation Characteristics in Yak.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of different concentrate-to-roughage ratios on the rumen microbial community, functional potential, and fermentation characteristics in yak. Forty Qinghai Plateau-type yaks (8-9 months, 68.725 ± 18.973 kg) were randomly assigned to four dietary groups with concentrate-to-roughage ratios of 80:20 (C80), 65:35 (C65), 50:50 (C50), and 35:65 (C35). After a 15-day adaptation period, animals were fed for 105 days. Rumen contents were analyzed using metagenomic sequencing combined with fermentation parameter measurements. High-concentrate diets (C80 and C65) were associated with increased relative abundance of starch-degrading and propionate-producing bacteria, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.